Biomarker Testing Research Articles

The State of State Biomarker Testing Insurance Coverage Laws.

The State of State Biomarker Testing Insurance Coverage Laws.

Combined biomarker testing for the assessment of cardio-renal interactions among myocardial infarction patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background The utility of different biomarkers for the prediction of either renal or cardiovascular outcomes following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been evaluated in several studies however, very few data exist on the prognostic value of combining biomarkers. Among numerous biomarkers examined, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Neutrophil gelatinase associated Lipocalin (NGAL) stand high in their utility to assess the cardiorenal crosstalk. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of combined CRP and NGAL measurement for the assessment of renal and cardiovascular outcomes in reperfused STEMI patients. Methods Blood samples for plasma NGAL and CRP were drawn 24 hours after admission. High NGAL and CRP were defined as values within the 4th quartile (>75percentile). Patients were stratified into 4 study groups: Low NGAL/Low CRP, LOW NGAL/high CRO, High NGAL /low CRP and high NGAL/high CRP. Patients were assessed for the occurrence of in-hospital adverse clinical events (MACE). These included occurrence of acute kidney injury , 30-day mortality and their combination. Results A total of 311 patients were included (mean age 66 ± 14 years, 81% males). According to the 4 study groups, there was a stepwise increase in the proportion of in hospital MACE ( 9% vs. 21% vs. 40% vs. 68% ;p,0.001,figure 1). In a multivariate regression model , compared to patients having low NGAL/low CRP we observed a graded, independent increase in the risk for MACE for low NGAL/high CRP , high NGAL/low CRP and high NGAL/high CRP levels( OR 2.89, p=0.02 vs. OR 3.29,p<0.001 vs. OR 17.6,p<0.001 respectively). Peak concentrations showed significant areas under the curves (AUCs) for the prediction of MACE for both CRP AUC (0.692,95% CI 0.62-0.76) and NGAL ( AUC 0.778,95% CI 0.72-0.84). The combination of NGAL and CRP yielded a significant increase in AUC to 0.822 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.88) (combined biomarkers vs CRP: p<0.001 and combined vs. NGAL :p=0.02,figure 2). Conclusions In patients with reperfused STEMI, the combined assessment of NGAL and CRP provided incremental prognostic information for the prediction of in hospital MACE when compared with single-biomarker measurement.Proportion of in-hospital MACEAUC CR NGAL

Distinct longitudinal patterns of urine tumor DNA in patients undergoing surveillance for bladder cancer.

Cystoscopy is the gold standard for surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but the procedure is invasive and has suboptimal accuracy. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of analyzing urine samples for the presence of urine tumor DNA (utDNA) to replace cystoscopy for surveillance of bladder cancer recurrence. In this longitudinal, prospective, and observational study, 47 patients were followed for recurrence for 2 years, involving analysis of utDNA using the BladMetrix DNA methylation biomarker test at each cystoscopy. In total, utDNA was detected in 21/23 recurrences (91% sensitivity), including 5/5 T1, T2, and carcinoma in situ (CIS) tumors (100%) and 10/12 Ta tumors (83%), with < 1% false-negative test results. Importantly, utDNA analysis showed the potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies by 55%, benefitting 79% of the patients. Eleven of 23 recurrences (48%) were detected earlier with utDNA than with cystoscopy, and distinct patterns of residual utDNA post-surgery indicated minimal residual disease (MRD) or field effect in 6% and 15% of the patients, respectively. In conclusion, utDNA analysis shows high sensitivity to detect tumor recurrence, potential to reduce the number of cystoscopies, and promise to guide patient-specific surveillance regimens.

Assessment of Preanalytical Cerebrospinal Fluid Handling and Storage Factors on Measurement of Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and pTau181 Using an Automated Chemiluminescent Platform.

Standardizing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) laboratory protocols will improve the reliability and availability of clinical biomarker testing required for prescription of novel Alzheimer disease (AD) therapies. This study evaluated several preanalytical handling and storage factors common to β-amyloid1-42 (Aβ1-42), β-amyloid1-40 (Aβ1-40), and phosphorylated tau (pTau181) concentrations including storage at different temperatures, extended cap contact, various mixing methods, and multiple freeze-thaw cycles. Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, and pTau181 concentrations were measured using LUMIPULSE G1200 automated assays. Samples were collected in polypropylene tubes of various volumes. Sample cap-contact was evaluated by storing samples in upright and inverted positions at either 4°C for 1 week or -80°C for 1 month. To assess mixing methods, samples were freeze-thawed and mixed by inversion, vortex, horizontal roller, or unmixed prior to assay sampling. The impact of successive freeze-thaw cycles was assessed through freezing, thawing, and analyzing CSF samples. Short-term storage at 4°C did not affect Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, or pTau181 measurements in any tube type. Tube cap contact affected Aβ1-42 in 2.5 mL tubes and pTau181 levels in 10 mL tubes. No difference was observed between mixing methods. After 4 freeze-thaw cycles, Aβ1-42 significantly decreased but Aβ1-40 remained unchanged. Utilizing the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio, Aβ1-42 values normalized, maintaining ratio values within ±5% of baseline measurements. Storage of CSF at 4°C for 1 week or -80°C for 1 month did not significantly affect Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, pTau181, or associated ratio measurements. Tube cap-contact impacted pTau181 and pTau181/Aβ1-42 values in larger tubes. Mixing methods are equivalent. The Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio compensates for freeze-thaw variability up to 4 cycles.

Oesophageal cell collection device and biomarker testing to identify high-risk Barrett's patients requiring endoscopic investigation.

Barrett's oesophagus surveillance places significant burden on endoscopy services yet is vital to detect early cancerous change. Oesophageal cell collection device (OCCD) testing was introduced across Scotland for Barrett's surveillance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This national pragmatic retrospective study presents the CytoSCOT programme results and evaluates whether OCCD testing is successfully identifying high-risk Barrett's patients requiring urgent endoscopy. All patients undergoing OCCD testing for Barrett's surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards over a 32-month period were identified. Patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD test were included. Individual patient records were interrogated to record clinical information and OCCD test result to categorize patients into risk groups. Endoscopic histopathology results were analysed according to risk group and segment length. Patients were deemed high risk if the OCCD test demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. 4204 OCCD tests were performed in 3745 patients: 608 patients underwent endoscopy within 12 months and were included in this analysis. Patients with longer Barrett's segments were significantly more likely to have an abnormal OCCD test. 50/608 patients (8.2%) had high-grade dysplasia or cancer on endoscopic biopsies: this equates to 1.3% of the total group (50/3745). 46/50 patients (92.0%) were deemed high risk, triggering urgent endoscopy: this rose to 100% with insufficient tests removed. There were no cancers diagnosed within 12 months post-OCCD in the low-risk group. OCCD testing is an effective triage tool to identify high-risk patients with Barrett's oesophagus requiring further investigation with endoscopy within the real-world setting.

Abstract PO5-06-10: Evaluating Disparities in Access to Quality Cancer Care for Black Women with Triple Negative Breast Cancer in the US: A Provider Perspective

Abstract Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents unique challenges due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Black women are disproportionately affected by TNBC, experiencing higher incidence rates and poorer outcomes compared to other racial/ethnic groups. This study aims to evaluate disparities in access to quality cancer care for Black women with TNBC from the perspective of oncology healthcare providers. Methods: From December 2022 to February 2023, the Association of Community Cancer Centers conducted a survey of 84 multidisciplinary care team members who provided care to Black patients with TNBC. The online survey captured quantitative and qualitative data on challenges related to accessing timely TNBC diagnosis and treatment services, care coordination for work-up and biomarker testing, confidence in TNBC treatment, clinical trial enrollment, supportive care services, and related referrals. Additionally, a follow-up focus group was conducted in May 2023 to further interpret select survey data, with a focus on shared decision-making, patient-provider communication, and ways to support cancer programs in improving screening, biomarker testing, and care coordination for individuals with TNBC. Results: Respondents reported several barriers to accessing timely diagnosis and treatment services for Black women with TNBC, including challenges in coordinating care for work-up and biomarker testing, providers' confidence in providing guideline-concordant comprehensive cancer care services for this patient population, enrolling patients in clinical trials, and making referrals for supportive care services. The survey revealed that community cancer programs treated an average of 21-50 patients with TNBC annually, with 31% of them being Black. Perceived patient-level factors contributing to challenges in accessing TNBC diagnosis and treatment included geographic distance to care facilities (14%), health literacy (18%), and insurance-related factors (21%). Practice-level barriers included limited accessibility of practice location (19%), capacity to accommodate new patients (27%), and insurance-related factors (34%). Additional findings highlighted slightly lower provider confidence in areas such as tobacco cessation (only 54% very confident), breast reconstruction (59% very confident), fertility counseling (52% very confident), and coordinating care across a fragmented healthcare system (52% very confident). Respondents identified the most commonly offered comprehensive cancer care services as palliative care (82%), nutrition support (77%), telemedicine (68%), psychological counseling (68%), and financial advocacy (68%). Less commonly offered services include recreational therapy (21%), legal aid (17%), and childcare (16%). Conclusion: This study highlighted the barriers faced by providers in delivering quality cancer care to Black women with TNBC. The findings underscore the importance of addressing challenges related to timely diagnosis and treatment services, care coordination, confidence in treatment options, clinical trial enrollment, and referrals for supportive care services. Insights from the focus group discussions further highlight the need for shared decision-making, improved patient-provider communication, and identification of opportunities to support cancer programs in addressing the specific needs of Black women with TNBC. To advance equity in cancer care, targeted interventions should focus on enhancing provider education, improving care coordination systems, and promoting cultural sensitivity. Efforts should also be made to overcome barriers related to limited accessibility of practice location, and insurance-related factors. By addressing these gaps, providers can play a crucial role in reducing disparities and improving outcomes for Black women with TNBC. Citation Format: Doreen Effange, Niharika Dixit, Ruth O'Regan, Ogori Kalu, Ryann Norcereto, Richard Simonds, Elizabeth Valencia, LaToya Bolds-Johnson, Aubrey Van Kirk Villalobos, Christie Mangir, Elana Plotkin, Karen Tacka, Leigh Boehmer. Evaluating Disparities in Access to Quality Cancer Care for Black Women with Triple Negative Breast Cancer in the US: A Provider Perspective [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-06-10.

Diagnostic accuracy of serological and imaging tests used in surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with cirrhosis: a systematic review protocol

Background Liver cirrhosis is the largest risk factor for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and surveillance is therefore recommended among this population. Current guidance recommends surveillance with ultrasound, with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). This review is part of a larger project looking at benefits, harms and costs of surveillance for HCC in people with cirrhosis. It aims to synthesise the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging or biomarker tests, alone or in combination, to identify HCC in adults with liver cirrhosis in a surveillance programme. Methods We will identify studies through a 2021 Cochrane review with similar eligibility criteria, and a database search of MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We will include diagnostic test accuracy studies with adult cirrhosis patients of any aetiology. Studies must assess at least one of the following index tests: ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerised tomography (CT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP), lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3), a genomic biomarker, or a diagnostic prediction model incorporating at least one of the above-mentioned tests. We will assess studies for risk of bias using QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C. We will combine data using bivariate random effects meta-analyses. For tests evaluated across varying diagnostic thresholds, we will produce pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity across the full range of numerical thresholds, where possible. Where sufficient studies compare two or more index tests, we will perform additional analyses to compare the accuracy of different tests. Where feasible, we will stratify all meta-analyses by tumour size and patient characteristics, including cirrhosis aetiology and liver disease severity. Discussion This review will synthesise evidence across the full range of possible surveillance tests, using advanced statistical methods to summarise accuracy across all thresholds and to compare the accuracy of different tests. PROSPERO registration CRD42022357163

Abstract PO1-04-12: Palbociclib versus ribociclib in first-line treatment of patients with hormone-receptor positive HER2 negative advanced breast cancer – real world outcome data from the German registry platform OPAL

Abstract Introduction CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKi) plus endocrine therapy (ET) are standard of care in first-line (1L) treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). In the pivotal trials the three CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) + ET showed similar progression-free survival (PFS) benefit over ET alone. However, other than ribociclib, palbociclib failed to demonstrate overall survival (OS) benefit. As patient (pts) characteristics differed between the trials, especially in the number of pts with treatment-free interval (TFI) of &amp;lt; 12 months after end of adjuvant ET, head-to-head comparisons of the CDKi are of clinical interest. Here we analyze the outcome of pts treated with palbociclib + ET or ribociclib + ET with real-world data from OPAL. Methods OPAL (NCT03417115) is a prospective observational, open, longitudinal multicenter cohort study (clinical registry) in Germany. Pts with ABC and early breast cancer can be recruited at start of their first systemic treatment. There are no treatment restrictions. Sites from all medical sectors can participate in OPAL (medical and gynecologic oncologists from outpatient centers and hospitals). Details on all (sequential) treatments, patient and tumor characteristics, biomarker testing, clinical and patient-reported outcomes are collected. Follow-Up is until death or up to 5 years. Between 01/2018 and 07/2021 1049 pts with HR+ HER2- ABC were recruited by 143 sites. Database cut was on 31/08/2022. 384 pts received palbociclib + ET and 231 pts received ribociclib + ET as 1L treatment. All endocrine combination partners including switch of ET during first line therapy was allowed, whereas switch of CDK4/6i (n=25) were excluded. PFS in registries can differ from PFS in clinical trials, since the RECIST criteria are usually not applied in routine care. PFS in registries represents the time to clinically relevant progression in routine care. PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To adjust for confounding, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) by propensity score analysis was used to compare PFS and OS between 1L palbociclib+ET and ribociclib+ET. IPTW was performed for the following variables: age, menopausal status, ECOG, any comorbidity, Charlson comorbidity index, metastatic stage, type of metastasis, number of metastatic sites, estrogen-/progesterone status, IHC status, previous chemo-/endocrine therapy, kind of endocrine combination partner, disease-free interval, and treatment-free interval. Results From 2018 to 2021, the proportion of CDK4/6i increased from 68% to 86% in 1L of HR+HER2- ABC. Overall, palbociclib was used in 44% and ribociclib in 26% of all first-line treatments in OPAL. Median age of pts receiving palbociclib/ribociclib was 66/68 years and for 77/81% of pts at least one comorbidity was documented. 37/35% of pts already had metastasis at diagnosis (M1) and 25/26% of pts had a TFI &amp;lt; 12 months. After IPTW, the two treatment groups were comparable for all tested characteristics. 42/46% of patients had a progression (palbociclib/ribociclib group). IPTW-adjusted median PFS was 25.1 months (95% Confidence interval (CI) 20.1 – 30.1) for the palbociclib and 27.0 months (95%-CI 21.1 – 31.6) for the ribociclib group. Hazard ratio was 0.91 (0.71 – 1.17) for palbociclib versus ribociclib. 26/29% of patients had an OS event (palbociclib/ribociclib group). IPTW-adjusted median OS was 36.7 months (95%-CI 33.0 – NA) for the palbociclib and 36.6 months (95%-CI 33.1 – NA) for the ribociclib group. Hazard ratio was 0.95 (0.69 - 1.30) for palbociclib versus ribociclib. Conclusions This analysis of real word data in the OPAL registry platform showed similar PFS and OS for palbociclib + ET compared to ribociclib + ET, when adjusted for a wide range of potential confounding variables. Further analyses will investigate whether one drug showed favorable results in certain subgroups of pts. Citation Format: Marc Thill, Mark-Oliver Zahn, Anja Welt, Arnd Nusch, Matthias Zaiss, Kathrin Engelken, Gabriele Kaltenecker, Kai Ringwald, Katja Gratzke, Lisa Kruggel, Martina Jänicke, Holger Schulz, Christoph Losem, Volker Hagen, Roland Fricker, Elmar Stickeler, Nadia Harbeck, Achim Wöckel, Thomas Decker. Palbociclib versus ribociclib in first-line treatment of patients with hormone-receptor positive HER2 negative advanced breast cancer – real world outcome data from the German registry platform OPAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-04-12.

Abstract PO3-16-07: Strategies to Enact for Equitable and Unbiased Care of Black, Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Black women are at higher risk for early onset and increased breast cancer mortality, especially from the sub-type Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), than their white peers. A patient experience survey has not been implemented or published for Black women diagnosed with TNBC. Tigerlily Foundation (TLF) conducted a TNBC survey of BIack women to understand the patient experience throughout the cancer continuum of care. Methods: The survey instrument received an IRB exception and included 40 questions organized by the following themes: Demographics, Self-Detection/Early Assessment, Screening to Diagnosis, Diagnosis to Treatment, Post Treatment and Palliative Care/Survivorship, Emotional Trauma and Mental Health, and Trust/Bias. Data collection occurred between December 2022 and January 2023.  Two methodological approaches influenced this innovative study design: 1) a Health Literate and Culturally Sensitive approach and 2) a Trusted Outreach approach. The survey was sent to leaders of patient-based organizations who shared the TLF survey with their constituents. Results: All participants (N = 106) racially identified as Black women diagnosed with TNBC. The age of participants ranged from 25 – 71. Participants were not always given information to manage their expectations before or after the screening process, as 38% reported they did not receive such information, while 45% reported they did. The number of times participants required diagnostic imaging ranged from only once (24%), two-three times (41%), four-five times (17%), or greater than six times (11%). Biopsies also varied among participants from one (25%), two-three times (40%), four-five times (15%), or greater than six times (8%). Biomarker testing was not equitably offered to all participants, as 30% reported they were not given the opportunity, while 48% were given the choice. While most participants reported a good understanding of their prognosis and treatment options (59%), other participants shared that the information they received could have been better (26%). Others stated they were given zero information to work with (15%). Many participants experienced a diagnosis change, and 57% were initially diagnosed with a different breast cancer subtype, while 24% were initially diagnosed with TNBC. Conclusions: Prospective implementation science is needed to ensure equitable care standards are sustainably provided to Black women. It is imperative to understand the cancer care continuum from the perspective of the patients, what they think of the care received. Equally important, it is necessary to know what education, resources and care the patients would have liked to receive before or upon diagnosis. Health equity is not achieved based on EHR, county-level beneficiary data, or SEER data alone. Gathering information regarding the patients' experience is a factor in achieving health equity. TLF successfully reached Black TNBC patients to share their authentic experiences and provided a framework for other research institutions and patient advocacy groups to do the same. Citation Format: Virginia Leach, Jeanne Regnante, Maimah Karmo, Shanda Cooper, Krista Peoples, Lizzie Wittig. Strategies to Enact for Equitable and Unbiased Care of Black, Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-16-07.

With Increased Biomarker Testing, Experts Are Redefining How to Describe and Discuss Dementia

With Increased Biomarker Testing, Experts Are Redefining How to Describe and Discuss Dementia

Abstract PO1-06-09: Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337

Abstract Up to 2/3 of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have acquired defects in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, yet poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) monotherapy has been largely ineffective in the absence of a germline BRCA 1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2). Phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway alterations are also common in breast cancers. Preclinical data suggest that PI3K/mTOR inhibition may disrupt normal function of the HR complex and increase dependency on PARP enzymes for HR DNA repair. Thus, combining a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor with a PARPi may result in a synergistic anti-neoplastic effect. The run-in portion of this study evaluated the safety of weekly IV gedatolisib (PI3K/mTORi) and continuous daily talazoparib to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). A 3+3 design for dose escalation explored two dose levels. The phase II study began once the MTD and R2PD were confirmed. Eligibility required age ≥ 18, 1-2 prior lines of therapy (protocol later amended to allow up to 3 lines), and advanced TNBC or advanced HER2-negative BC with gBRCA1/2 mutation. The sample size for the phase II study was determined based on a 1-sided binomial test under the null and alternative ORR of 5% vs 20% with a type I error rate of 0.1 and power level of 80%. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in TNBC without known gBRCA1/2 with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with a gBRCA1/2 mutation were not included in the primary endpoint analysis. Correlative studies are planned to evaluate HR deficiency mutations, PIK3CA mutations, and other exploratory genomics. A total of 33 patients were enrolled: 14 in the safety run-in phase of the trial and 19 in the phase II study (17 TNBC, 2 with gBRCA2 mutation). In the safety run-in, 6 patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (0.75 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly) and 8 at dose level 2 (1 mg talazoparib po daily and 180 mg gedatolisib IV weekly). 42% of the cohort developed hyperglycemia, which was mostly grade 1. There was 1 DLT of grade 3 neutropenia at dose level 1. There were 3 patients who experienced grade 4 AEs, thrombocytopenia (2) and lymphopenia (1) which were outside of the DLT window. The MTD was 1 mg of talazoparib daily and 180 mg of gedatolisib weekly, and this was selected as the RP2D. A protocol amendment was made during the phase II portion to allow for a 3 week on/1 week off schedule for gedatolisib due to emerging data showing a more favorable safety profile and enhanced antitumor activity with this dosing schedule. In the 17 patients with TNBC and no gBRCA mutation in the phase II cohort, the ORR was 12%. Best response was partial response (PR) in 2 patients (12%), stable disease (SD) in 7 patients (41%), and progressive disease (PD) in 8 patients (47%). The clinical benefit rate (ORR+SD) at 16 weeks was 23.5%. The most common adverse events (AEs) in all 33 patients were anemia (70%), fatigue (67%), oral mucositis (64%), nausea (60%), neutropenia (45%) and anorexia (45%). Of these, most were grade 1-2 other than anemia (35% grade 3), neutropenia (20% grade 3), fatigue (18% grade 3), and oral mucositis (10% grade 3). There were no grade 4 AEs in the phase II study. Median PFS was approximately 3 months and median OS was approximately 6.4 months. Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint, there were 2 TNBC patients without a gBRCA1/2 mutation who achieved a partial response to this non-chemotherapy regimen. Future biomarker testing may help elucidate these findings and possible predictors of response. Citation Format: Sneha Phadke, Kari Wisinski, Oana Danciu, Ami Shah, Menggang Yu, Yi Chen, Kathy Miller, Mark Burkard. Phase 2 Trial with Safety Run-In of Gedatolisib Plus Talazoparib in Advanced Triple Negative or BRCA1/2 Positive, HER2 Negative Breast CancersBig Ten Cancer Research Consortium BTCRC-BRE18-337 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-09.

Targeting Aging and Longevity with Exogenous Nucleotides (TALENTs): Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Older Adults.

Nucleotides (NTs), important biomolecules involved in numerous cellular processes, have been proposed as potential candidates for anti-aging interventions. However, whether nucleotides can act as an anti-aging supplement in older adults remains unclear. TALENTs is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial that evaluates the efficacy and safety of NTs as an anti-aging supplement in older adults by exploring the effects of NTs on multiple dimensions of aging in a rigorous scientific setting. Eligible community-dwelling adults aged 60-70 years were randomly assigned equally to two groups: nucleotides intervention group and placebo control group. Comprehensive geriatric health assessments were performed at baseline, 2-months, and 4-months of the intervention. Biological specimens were collected and stored for age-related biomarker testing and multi-omics sequencing. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to 4 months on leukocyte telomere length and DNA methylation age. The secondary aims were the changes in possible mechanisms underlying aging processes (immunity, inflammatory profile, oxidative stress, gene stability, endocrine, metabolism, and cardiovascular function). Other outcomes were changes in physical function, body composition and geriatric health assessment (including sleep quality, cognitive function, fatigue, frailty, and psychology). In the RCT, 301 participants were assessed for eligibility and 122 were enrolled. Participants averaged 65.65 years of age, and were predominately female (67.21%). All baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups, as expected due to randomization. The majority of participants were pre-frailty and had at least one chronic condition. The mean scores for physical activity, psychological, fatigue and quality of life were within the normal range. However, nearly half of the participants still had room for improvement in cognitive level and sleep quality. This TALENTs trial will represent one of the most comprehensive experimental clinical trials in which supplements are administered to elderly participants. The findings of this study will contribute to our understanding of the anti-aging effects of NTs and provide insights into their potential applications in geriatric healthcare.

Molecular Diagnostics and Treatment Patterns in Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Real World Evidence from Greece: LACHESIS Study.

Lung cancer, primarily non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is the leading cause of cancer deaths globally. In Greece in 2020, 8,960 new cases were reported. NSCLC's 5-year survival rates range from 54% (stage I) to less than 2% (stage IV); however, innovative therapies like immune check points inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted treatments have notably enhanced outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the 1st and 2nd line treatment patterns with the introduction of new treatment modalities. Additionally, we evaluated biomarker testing approaches in NSCLC. LACHESIS was a retrospective multinational study, collecting and analyzing data from adult patients from Russia, Bulgaria, and Greece with metastatic NSCLC either newly diagnosed or relapsed from earlier stages, who had the option to undergo biomarker testing (genetic alterations/programmed death-ligand 1 protein expression levels, PD-L1), and who received 1st line treatment for squamous (SQ) or non-squamous (N-SQ) NSCLC. Subsequent lines of therapy were also reported. The Greek site registered retrospective data from 250 NSCLC patients, of whom 206 were newly diagnosed (ND) metastatic NSCLC patients and 44 were patients relapsed from earlier stages. Seventy-two had SQ NSCLC and 169 had N-SQ NSCLC. For these patients, treatment patterns including immunotherapy±chemotherapy combinations were recorded. Biomarker testing patterns, including genetic alterations and PD-L1 expression levels were also documented. LACHESIS provides treatment patterns and biomarker testing data. Greek patients were treated according to international guidelines, with immunotherapy as a viable option, particularly for PD-L1 levels over 50%. Biomarker testing, crucial for non-squamous (N-SQ) cases, should yield timely results for driver mutations, prioritizing patient benefits.

Immunohistochemistry of Lung Cancer Biomarkers.

Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining represents a comparatively inexpensive testing method that is attractive as a potential alternative to molecular sequencing methods or fluorescence in situ hybridization for pulmonary biomarker testing. While a variety of IHC tests directed at actionable genetic alterations have been developed and evaluated since the advent of targeted therapy, specific antibody clones for anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ROS-1, and potentially neurotrophic tropmyosin receptor kinase have been the primary antibodies that provide sufficiently robust results to be utilized as either a primary testing or screening method to direct targeted therapy. Antibodies for a variety of other targets such as epidermal growth factor receptors, for example, have lacked sufficient sensitivity and specificity to cover the range of mutations that may occur and are generally not recommended in lieu of molecular testing with the exception of limited resource settings. IHC is also used as a predictive marker for response to immunotherapy through evaluation of programmed death ligand 1 expression. In addition, multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are under investigation, designed to deliver drugs directly to tumor cells through binding to specific target antigens. Some ADCs have already received accelerated FDA approval, and IHC was incorporated in many clinical trials evaluating ADC efficacy. As such, it is anticipated that ADCs may have a companion diagnostic IHC to guide patient selection.

Recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice guidelines in the US.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Pharmacogenetic testing can identify patients who may benefit from personalized drug treatment. However, clinical uptake of pharmacogenetic testing has been limited. Clinical practice guidelines recommend biomarker tests that the guideline authors deem to have demonstrated clinical utility, meaning that testing improves treatment outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the current status of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations within clinical practice guidelines in the US. Guidelines were reviewed for pharmacogenetic testing recommendations for 21 gene-drug pairs that have well-established drug response associations and all of which are categorized as clinically actionable by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. The degree of consistency within and between organizations in pharmacogenetic testing recommendations was assessed. Relatively few clinical practice guidelines that provide a pharmacogenetic testing recommendation were identified. Testing recommendations for HLA-B*57:01 before initiation of abacavir and G6PD before initiation of rasburicase, both of which are included in drug labeling, were mostly consistent across guidelines. Gene-drug pairs with at least one clinical practice guideline recommending testing or stating that testing could be considered included CYP2C19-clopidogrel, CYP2D6-codeine, CYP2D6-tramadol, CYP2B6-efavirenz, TPMT-thiopurines, and NUDT15-thiopurines. Testing recommendations for the same gene-drug pair were often inconsistent between organizations and sometimes inconsistent between different guidelines from the same organization. A standardized approach to evaluating the evidence of clinical utility for pharmacogenetic testing may increase the inclusion and consistency of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, which could benefit patients and society by increasing clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing.

Development and Validation of an 18-Gene Urine Test for High-Grade Prostate Cancer

Benefits of prostate cancer (PCa) screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) alone are largely offset by excess negative biopsies and overdetection of indolent cancers resulting from the poor specificity of PSA for high-grade PCa (ie, grade group [GG] 2 or greater). To develop a multiplex urinary panel for high-grade PCa and validate its external performance relative to current guideline-endorsed biomarkers. RNA sequencing analysis of 58 724 genes identified 54 markers of PCa, including 17 markers uniquely overexpressed by high-grade cancers. Gene expression and clinical factors were modeled in a new urinary test for high-grade PCa (MyProstateScore 2.0 [MPS2]). Optimal models were developed in parallel without prostate volume (MPS2) and with prostate volume (MPS2+). The locked models underwent blinded external validation in a prospective National Cancer Institute trial cohort. Data were collected from January 2008 to December 2020, and data were analyzed from November 2022 to November 2023. Protocolized blood and urine collection and transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Multiple biomarker tests were assessed in the validation cohort, including serum PSA alone, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator, and the Prostate Health Index (PHI) as well as derived multiplex 2-gene and 3-gene models, the original 2-gene MPS test, and the 18-gene MPS2 models. Under a testing approach with 95% sensitivity for PCa of GG 2 or greater, measures of diagnostic accuracy and clinical consequences of testing were calculated. Cancers of GG 3 or greater were assessed secondarily. Of 761 men included in the development cohort, the median (IQR) age was 63 (58-68) years, and the median (IQR) PSA level was 5.6 (4.6-7.2) ng/mL; of 743 men included in the validation cohort, the median (IQR) age was 62 (57-68) years, and the median (IQR) PSA level was 5.6 (4.1-8.0) ng/mL. In the validation cohort, 151 (20.3%) had high-grade PCa on biopsy. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were 0.60 using PSA alone, 0.66 using the risk calculator, 0.77 using PHI, 0.76 using the derived multiplex 2-gene model, 0.72 using the derived multiplex 3-gene model, and 0.74 using the original MPS model compared with 0.81 using the MPS2 model and 0.82 using the MPS2+ model. At 95% sensitivity, the MPS2 model would have reduced unnecessary biopsies performed in the initial biopsy population (range for other tests, 15% to 30%; range for MPS2, 35% to 42%) and repeat biopsy population (range for other tests, 9% to 21%; range for MPS2, 46% to 51%). Across pertinent subgroups, the MPS2 models had negative predictive values of 95% to 99% for cancers of GG 2 or greater and of 99% for cancers of GG 3 or greater. In this study, a new 18-gene PCa test had higher diagnostic accuracy for high-grade PCa relative to existing biomarker tests. Clinically, use of this test would have meaningfully reduced unnecessary biopsies performed while maintaining highly sensitive detection of high-grade cancers. These data support use of this new PCa biomarker test in patients with elevated PSA levels to reduce the potential harms of PCa screening while preserving its long-term benefits.

Physico-Chemical Properties of CdTe/Glutathione Quantum Dots Obtained by Microwave Irradiation for Use in Monoclonal Antibody and Biomarker Testing.

In this report, we present the results on the physicochemical characterization of cadmium telluride quantum dots (QDs) stabilized with glutathione and prepared by optimizing the synthesis conditions. An excellent control of emissions and the composition of the nanocrystal surface for its potential application in monoclonal antibody and biomarker testing was achieved. Two samples (QDYellow, QDOrange, corresponding to their emission colors) were analyzed by dynamic light scattering (DLS), and their hydrodynamic sizes were 6.7 nm and 19.4 nm, respectively. Optical characterization by UV-vis absorbance spectroscopy showed excitonic peaks at 517 nm and 554 nm. Photoluminescence spectroscopy indicated that the samples have a maximum intensity emission at 570 and 606 nm, respectively, within the visible range from yellow to orange. Infrared spectroscopy showed vibrational modes corresponding to the functional groups OH-C-H, C-N, C=C, C-O, C-OH, and COOH, which allows for the formation of functionalized QDs for the manufacture of biomarkers. In addition, the hydrodynamic radius, zeta potential, and approximate molecular weight were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS), electrophoretic light scattering (ELS), and static light scattering (SLS) techniques. Size dispersion and the structure of nanoparticles was obtained by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and by X-ray diffraction. In the same way, we calculated the concentration of Cd2+ ions expressed in mg/L by using the Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). In addition to the characterization of the nanoparticles, the labeling of murine myeloid cells was carried out with both samples of quantum dots, where it was demonstrated that quantum dots can diffuse into these cells and connect mostly with the cell nucleus.

Programmed Death Ligand-1 and Tumor Mutation Burden Testing of Patients With Lung Cancer for Selection of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Pulmonary Pathology Society, and LUNGevity Foundation.

Rapid advancements in the understanding and manipulation of tumor-immune interactions have led to the approval of immune therapies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Certain immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies require the use of companion diagnostics, but methodologic variability has led to uncertainty around test selection and implementation in practice. To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations for the testing of immunotherapy/immunomodulatory biomarkers, including programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutation burden (TMB), in patients with lung cancer. The College of American Pathologists convened a panel of experts in non-small cell lung cancer and biomarker testing to develop evidence-based recommendations in accordance with the standards for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines established by the National Academy of Medicine. A systematic literature review was conducted to address 8 key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, recommendations were created from the available evidence, certainty of that evidence, and key judgments as defined in the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework. Six recommendation statements were developed. This guideline summarizes the current understanding and hurdles associated with the use of PD-L1 expression and TMB testing for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy selection in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and presents evidence-based recommendations for PD-L1 and TMB testing in the clinical setting.

Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2 A in serum is an ideal biomarker for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease

BackgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that early intervention was the best plan to inhibit the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which relied on the discovery of early diagnostic biomarkers. In this study, synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2 A (SV2A) was examined to improve the early diagnostic efficiency in AD.MethodsIn this study, biomarker testing was performed through the single-molecule array (Simoa). A total of 121 subjects including cognitively unimpaired controls, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), AD and other types of dementia underwent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) SV2A testing; 430 subjects including health controls, aMCI, AD and other types of dementia underwent serum SV2A, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL) and p-tau217 testing; 92 subjects including aMCI and AD underwent both CSF SV2A and serum SV2A testing; 115 cognitively unimpaired subjects including APOE ε4 carriers and APOE ε4 non-carriers were tested for serum SV2A, GFAP, NfL and p-tau217. Then, the efficacy of SV2A for the early diagnosis of AD and its ability to identify those at high risk of AD from a cognitively unimpaired population were further analyzed.ResultsBoth CSF and serum SV2A significantly and positively correlated with cognitive performance in patients with AD, and their levels gradually decreased with the progression of AD. Serum SV2A demonstrated excellent diagnostic efficacy for aMCI, with a sensitivity of 97.8%, which was significantly higher than those of NfL, GFAP, and p-tau217. The SV2A-positive rates ranged from 92.86 to 100% in aMCI cases that were negative for the above three biomarkers. Importantly, of all the biomarkers tested, serum SV2A had the highest positivity rate (81.82%) in individuals at risk for AD.ConclusionsSerum SV2A was demonstrated to be a novel and ideal biomarker for the early diagnosis of AD, which can effectively distinguish those at high risk of AD in cognitively unimpaired populations.

A Multicenter Study on the Challenges and Real-World Utilization of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Resource-Constrained Settings: Insights and Implications from India

Using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer treatment, but access and affordability remain significant challenges, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This multicenter study evaluated the utilization, outcomes, and challenges associated with ICIs in India. Data from multiple centers involving patients treated between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected. Patient demographics, treatment indications, biomarker testing, financial coverage, toxicity, treatment discontinuation, clinical benefit, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Ninety-one patients were analyzed; lung cancer (39.6%) and renal cancer (11%) were the main indications for ICI use. Programmed death ligand 1 expression was tested in 40.7% and tumor mutational burden in 3.3%. Financial constraints influenced 41.8% of patients with out-of-pocket expenses. Treatment discontinuation due to financial constraints occurred in 17.6%, with 50% showing ongoing responses. The median number of cycles was 4; the median PFS was 4.6 months, and the median OS was 15.4 months. The lung cancer cohort had a median PFS of 5.7 months and a 1-year OS of 57.6%. Limited biomarker testing and 6.6% grade ¾ toxicities were observed. This study revealed challenges in ICI utilization in resource-constrained settings driven by financial constraints. Compared with prior studies, improved outcomes reflect better patient selection and evolving understanding of ICI use. However, in the absence of biosimilars, cost remains a significant barrier. Solutions to increase access include using lower doses, which may be as effective.